The Chhota Ghallughara, or the First Sikh Holocaust, was a devastating massacre in 1746 that marked one of the darkest chapters in Sikh history. While "Chhota" means small, this holocaust resulted in the deaths of thousands of Sikhs and was a critical event that shaped the trajectory of Sikh resistance against Mughal tyranny.

 

 

Historical Context

The Chhota Ghallughara unfolded during a time when Punjab was under the oppressive rule of the Mughal Empire. Throughout the early 18th century, the Mughals faced growing challenges to their dominance, and the Sikhs, under the guidance of their Gurus, emerged as a formidable force that sought to uphold justice and religious freedom. However, the rise of the Sikh community was seen as a direct threat to the Mughal authorities, who were keen on maintaining their grip over the region and suppressing any form of dissent. This led to systematic persecution aimed at stifling the growth of the Sikh movement.

 

Zakariya Khan, the governor of Lahore from 1726 to 1745, was a key figure behind the brutal oppression of Sikhs during this era. His rule was marked by a series of repressive policies designed to crush the Sikh faith and eradicate its followers. Determined to eliminate the Sikhs, Zakariya Khan placed a heavy bounty on their heads, offering rewards to anyone who captured or killed Sikhs. His forces hunted Sikhs relentlessly, forcing many to seek refuge in jungles, mountains, and remote areas. Despite the peaceful teachings of the Sikh Gurus, the community was subjected to relentless violence, with gurdwaras (Sikh places of worship) being desecrated and sacred texts destroyed.

 

Zakariya Khan’s reign of terror reached its peak when he ordered large-scale military campaigns against Sikhs, leading to brutal massacres and the displacement of countless Sikh families. The governor's tactics included public executions, torture, and financial incentives for those who betrayed the Sikhs. This environment of fear and constant persecution culminated in the events of the Chhota Ghallughara, where the Mughal forces aimed to crush the Sikh spirit once and for all. Despite these attempts, the Sikh community’s strength of character and resolve only deepened in the face of such adversity.

 

Bhai Mani Singh Shaheed: A Precursor to the Chhota Ghallughara

Bhai Mani Singh, a highly respected Sikh scholar, warrior, and leader, served as the head Granthi of Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple) during a period of intense Mughal persecution. Deeply committed to preserving Sikh teachings and protecting Sikh institutions, Bhai Mani Singh’s leadership was crucial as Mughal authorities, particularly under Zakariya Khan, ramped up efforts to suppress the growing Sikh community.

In 1737, Bhai Mani Singh arranged a large religious gathering at Harmandir Sahib for the celebration of Bandi Chhor Divas, after receiving permission from the Mughals on the condition that he would pay a significant tax. However, when the Mughals learned of the planned Sikh gathering, they plotted to massacre the attendees. Sensing the danger, Bhai Mani Singh canceled the event to protect the devotees, which meant he could not pay the agreed tax. In retaliation, Zakariya Khan ordered his arrest. Charged with treason, Bhai Mani Singh was sentenced to death and subjected to the brutal execution of being cut limb by limb, known as “bandi bandi” execution.

 

His martyrdom in 1738 marked a turning point in the Mughal campaign against the Sikhs. Rather than instilling fear, Bhai Mani Singh’s sacrifice inspired the Sikh community, galvanizing them to resist further oppression. His death intensified Mughal efforts to wipe out Sikhism, with public executions becoming more frequent and Mughal forces relentlessly hunting Sikh leaders. However, Bhai Mani Singh’s martyrdom became a rallying point for the Sikhs, strengthening their unity and resolve, and setting the stage for the larger massacres and resistance that followed, including the Chhota Ghallughara of 1746.

 

Causes of the Chhota Ghallughara

The Chhota Ghallughara was not an isolated incident but the culmination of escalating tensions between the Mughal rulers and the growing power of the Khalsa, the collective body of initiated Sikhs. Several key factors contributed to this brutal massacre, all rooted in the Mughals' increasing fear and hostility toward the Sikhs, as well as the Sikhs’ unwavering determination to assert their religious and political autonomy.

 

The Rise of the Khalsa and Its Growing Power
One of the primary causes of the Chhota Ghallughara was the rising influence and power of the Khalsa. Established by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699, the Khalsa had become a formidable force, both militarily and spiritually. By the 1740s, the Sikhs had organized themselves into guerrilla fighting units called "jathas," which frequently disrupted Mughal supply lines and local governance across Punjab. These jathas were highly disciplined and deeply committed to defending Sikh rights and resisting Mughal oppression. The increasing strength and influence of the Khalsa posed a serious threat to the Mughal rulers, who saw the Sikhs not only as a religious community but as an emerging political force that could undermine their control of Punjab.

 

Khalsa's Influence Over the Local Population
As the Khalsa's military capabilities grew, so did their influence over the local population. The Sikh message of justice, equality, and religious freedom resonated with many of the oppressed peoples under Mughal rule, further alarming the Mughal authorities and local rulers like Zakariya Khan, the governor of Lahore. Sikhs were gaining control over large areas of land, and their growing popularity made them a prime target for the Mughal Empire, which was determined to eliminate any challenge to its authority.

 

Revenge for Bhai Taru Singh’s Martyrdom and Sikh Uprisings
Another significant factor contributing to the Chhota Ghallughara was the Mughals’ desire for revenge following the martyrdom of Bhai Taru Singh and other Sikh uprisings. Bhai Taru Singh, a devout Sikh, had become a symbol of resistance against Mughal tyranny. In 1745, he was arrested for sheltering fellow Sikhs and given an ultimatum: convert to Islam or face torture. Bhai Taru Singh refused to renounce his faith, and as a result, he was brutally tortured—his scalp was removed as punishment for his defiance. Despite the excruciating pain, Bhai Taru Singh remained steadfast in his faith, and his martyrdom infuriated both the Sikh community and the Mughal authorities.

 

Cycle of Resistance and Mughal Repression
Bhai Taru Singh’s sacrifice became a rallying cry for Sikhs, further strengthening their resolve to resist Mughal oppression. In retaliation, the Mughal authorities, already angered by the growing Sikh uprisings, launched a new wave of brutal repression. The martyrdoms of prominent Sikhs like Bhai Taru Singh and Bhai Mani Singh were seen as direct challenges to Mughal rule, and the regime sought to crush the Sikh movement by force. Despite these oppressive tactics, the Sikhs persisted with their guerrilla warfare, refusing to bow to the Mughal regime. This escalating cycle of resistance and retaliation eventually led to the Chhota Ghallughara.

 

Mughal Campaign to Crush Sikh Resistance
These interconnected causes—rooted in the rise of the Khalsa and Mughal revenge for Sikh martyrdoms—culminated in the Mughal decision to launch a large-scale campaign against the Sikhs in 1746. Their goal was to break the back of Sikh resistance once and for all. The result was the Chhota Ghallughara, a violent massacre in which thousands of Sikhs were killed, and many more were displaced or captured, marking one of the most tragic and defining moments in Sikh history.

 

The Massacre at Kahnuwan

The Chhota Ghallughara reached its horrifying peak in 1746 with the massacre at Kahnuwan, a tragic event that exemplified the brutality of Mughal repression against the Sikh community. Lakhpat Rai, the Diwan (chief financial officer) of Lahore, orchestrated this massacre, driven by a deep thirst for revenge following the death of his brother, Jaspat Rai, who had been killed in a confrontation with the Sikhs. Fueled by personal hatred and a desire to eradicate the Sikh presence, Lakhpat Rai launched one of the darkest military campaigns in Sikh history.

 

The Sikhs, anticipating an attack, sought refuge in the dense forests and hills surrounding Kahnuwan. They hoped these natural defenses would shield them from the Mughal army. However, Lakhpat Rai, determined to avenge his brother and exterminate the Sikhs, mustered a large force of Mughal soldiers and mercenaries. In March 1746, he launched a full-scale assault, systematically scouring the forests for the Sikhs, who had taken shelter there. While the Sikhs were skilled in guerrilla tactics, they were vastly outnumbered and lacked the necessary resources to fend off such a well-organized and massive force.

 

The siege at Kahnuwan was merciless and protracted. The Mughal forces trapped the Sikhs, cutting off all possible escape routes and surrounding them. Over several days, wave after wave of Mughal soldiers attacked the Sikh families who had gathered in the forests, slaughtering them indiscriminately. The onslaught was relentless, and the death toll was staggering. According to historical accounts, approximately 7,000 Sikhs were killed during the massacre, and an additional 3,000 were captured. Those captured faced an equally horrific fate—many were taken to Lahore, where they were publicly executed as part of a campaign to instill fear and deter any future Sikh resistance.

This massacre at Kahnuwan was not simply a military defeat; it was a calculated and deliberate effort to wipe out the Sikh community in Punjab. Sikh men, women, and children were killed without mercy, and their bodies were left exposed as a gruesome warning to others who might consider challenging Mughal authority. The scale of the violence and destruction was designed to break the Sikh spirit and erase their influence from the region.

 

However, despite the immense loss of life and the brutality of the Mughal forces, the massacre failed to crush the Sikh community's resolve. Though they were heavily wounded and dispersed, the Sikhs would eventually regroup, rebuild, and continue their fight for survival and freedom. This resilience in the face of such overwhelming adversity became a defining characteristic of the Sikh ethos. The massacre at Kahnuwan during the Chhota Ghallughara served as a moment of profound tragedy, but it also strengthened the resolve of future generations of Sikhs to resist tyranny and oppression.

 

Bhai Bota Singh and Bhai Garja Singh: Symbols of Defiance

In the wake of the Chhota Ghallughara and the massacre at Kahnuwan, the Sikh community was deeply wounded, yet their spirit of defiance remained unbroken. Among those who personified this undying resistance were Bhai Bota Singh and Bhai Garja Singh. Their story of courage and martyrdom in 1746 stands as a powerful symbol of Sikh resilience and the unwavering commitment to uphold Khalsa sovereignty, even in the face of overwhelming odds.

Following the massacre, the Mughal authorities, believing they had successfully crushed the Sikhs, began to spread the narrative that the Khalsa had been entirely annihilated. Bhai Bota Singh and Bhai Garja Singh, unwilling to let such claims go unanswered, boldly decided to reassert the existence and defiance of the Khalsa. They did this by occupying a prominent highway between Tarn Taran and Amritsar, an area heavily frequented by travelers and Mughal officials.

 

In an act of open defiance, Bhai Bota Singh and Bhai Garja Singh declared Khalsa sovereignty by erecting a makeshift toll post on the highway, charging travelers a token fee—one anna for a cart and one paisa for a traveler on foot. This audacious move was not about collecting revenue but about sending a clear message to the Mughal authorities: the Khalsa was not defeated, and their presence would continue to challenge Mughal rule.

 

When news of this defiance reached Lahore, the Mughal governor immediately dispatched a contingent of soldiers to eliminate the two Sikhs. Aware of the impending attack, Bhai Bota Singh and Bhai Garja Singh chose to confront their enemies head-on, armed only with sticks and the strength of their faith. In the ensuing battle, they fought bravely but were ultimately martyred. Their sacrifice, however, had already achieved its purpose—reasserting the Sikh presence and demonstrating that the Khalsa, though diminished in numbers, remained unshakable in their determination to resist tyranny.

 

Their martyrdom became a rallying point for the Sikh community, inspiring others to continue the struggle for justice and sovereignty. Bhai Bota Singh and Bhai Garja Singh’s fearless proclamation of Khalsa sovereignty and their subsequent martyrdom highlighted the unyielding spirit of Sikh resistance, even in the darkest times of oppression.

 

Massa Ranghar: The Desecration of Harmandir Sahib and Sikh Retaliation

Another deeply significant episode in the period of Sikh resistance was the desecration of Harmandir Sahib (the Golden Temple) by Massa Ranghar in 1740, an act that ignited one of the most iconic retaliations in Sikh history. This event exemplified the Sikh community’s determination to defend their sacred sites and avenge acts of desecration, no matter the cost.

 

After Zakariya Khan’s relentless campaigns against the Sikhs, Mughal authorities appointed Massa Ranghar, a corrupt and self-serving landlord, as the caretaker of Amritsar. Under his control, Harmandir Sahib, a site of profound spiritual significance to Sikhs, was subjected to the most egregious acts of desecration. Massa Ranghar transformed the temple into his personal court of debauchery, allowing alcohol and tobacco—both strictly forbidden in Sikhism—inside the premises. He used the sacred space for entertainment, sitting inside the holy temple to watch dancing girls perform, all while mocking the Sikhs who had been forced out of the city.

 

The desecration of Harmandir Sahib was a severe insult to the Sikh faith and called for an immediate and decisive response. The task of avenging this sacrilege fell to two devout Sikhs, Bhai Mehtab Singh and Bhai Sukha Singh. Driven by their deep commitment to restore the sanctity of their faith, the two men set out from Rajasthan with a singular mission to reclaim the honor of Harmandir Sahib. Disguised as tax collectors, they approached Amritsar under the pretense of delivering revenue. When they reached the Golden Temple, they found Massa Ranghar seated inside, arrogantly indulging in his desecration of the sacred site.

Without hesitation, Bhai Mehtab Singh and Bhai Sukha Singh revealed their true purpose. In a swift and bold act of justice, they beheaded Massa Ranghar right inside the temple. This powerful act sent a clear and profound message to the Mughal authorities, as well as anyone else who dared to defile Sikh holy sites: the Sikhs would not tolerate such violations, and they would fiercely defend their faith and sacred spaces.

 

The assassination of Massa Ranghar was far more than an act of vengeance—it was a profound assertion of Sikh sovereignty and a testament to the community’s unwavering resolve to protect their religion. The successful retaliation restored the honor of Harmandir Sahib and reaffirmed the Sikh belief that their sacred places were inviolable, regardless of the persecution they faced.

 

This act of bravery was celebrated throughout the Sikh community, becoming legendary as an example of Sikh justice and resilience. The courage and determination of Bhai Mehtab Singh and Bhai Sukha Singh became emblematic of the Sikh commitment to uphold their faith, even in the face of overwhelming odds. The assassination of Massa Ranghar not only restored dignity to the Golden Temple but also reaffirmed that the Sikhs would rise to defend their beliefs and spaces, no matter how severe the persecution.

 

Aftermath: Resilience in the Face of Adversity

In the aftermath of the Chhota Ghallughara, the Sikh community faced one of the darkest and most challenging periods in their history. The massacre had drastically weakened the Khalsa, with thousands of men, women, and children killed and many more displaced, living in constant fear of persecution. Despite these devastating losses, the resilience of the Sikh Panth remained unshaken. While the Mughal authorities believed they had dealt a crippling blow, the Sikh community displayed remarkable fortitude, reorganizing and continuing their resistance with an unbreakable resolve. This tenacity became the hallmark of the Sikh spirit in the face of tyranny.

 

Reorganization: Formation of the Misls
Though scattered and forced to live in remote areas like forests, hills, and caves, the Sikhs quickly began to regroup. Under the leadership of brave and visionary figures, they reorganized their efforts to continue the fight. The Khalsa restructured into smaller, highly mobile fighting units known as "misls" (military confederacies), which operated autonomously but shared the common goal of defending the Sikh faith and people from Mughal oppression. Led by courageous commanders such as Nawab Kapur Singh, these misls played a pivotal role in helping the Sikhs recover from the devastation of the Chhota Ghallughara. Their successful reorganization laid the groundwork for future victories and ensured the survival of the Sikh community.

 

Spiritual and Social Resilience
In addition to their military resistance, the Sikhs demonstrated incredible social and religious resilience. Despite the dangers, they continued to gather at their sacred sites and sought solace in the teachings of their Gurus. Their sense of community deepened, and the shared trauma of the Chhota Ghallughara brought the Sikh Panth closer together, reinforcing their collective identity and purpose. Rather than breaking the Sikh spirit, the Mughal persecution strengthened their unity and devotion to their faith, providing a renewed sense of solidarity.

 

Emergence of New Sikh Leaders
The events following the Chhota Ghallughara also saw the rise of new Sikh leaders who would play pivotal roles in the continued struggle for justice. Figures like Nawab Kapur Singh and others emerged as strategic and spiritual leaders, guiding the community through this turbulent time. Although weakened by the massacre, the Sikhs remained steadfast in their mission to protect their faith and resist tyranny. Their preparations for future confrontations with the Mughals and local rulers set the stage for further escalations in the years to come, culminating in the eventual establishment of Sikh sovereignty in Punjab.

 

Significance and Legacy: The Lasting Impact of the Chhota Ghallughara

 

The Chhota Ghallughara holds immense significance in Sikh history, marking a period of intense suffering that, unexpectedly, became a source of inspiration for future generations. While it revealed the harsh extent of Mughal oppression, it also highlighted the extraordinary resilience of the Sikh Panth, a community that refused to be silenced despite repeated massacres. The sacrifices made during this time helped ingrain the ideals of bravery, unity, and self-sacrifice, which became central to Sikh identity. The martyrdom of so many Sikhs during this period created a deep sense of purpose and collective strength, driving their determination to oppose oppression and shaping their strategies for survival.

 

One of the lasting impacts of the Chhota Ghallughara was its role in inspiring ongoing resistance, eventually leading to the rise of the Sikh Empire. The Sikhs’ ability to regroup after the massacre laid the foundation for leaders like Jassa Singh Ahluwalia and Nawab Kapur Singh, who organized the community to claim their independence. This resilience, culminating in Maharaja Ranjit Singh's empire, underscored the enduring legacy of those who sacrificed their lives during the Chhota Ghallughara. The massacre also strengthened the principle of "Chardi Kala" (boundless optimism) in Sikh philosophy, ensuring that future generations would draw strength from their history of martyrdom, whether standing against British rule or seeking justice in modern times.

 

 

Note- We have made every effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information provided. However, this content is intended for informational purposes only and reflects historical and cultural perspectives. DVN does not assume responsibility for any disputes or actions that may arise from the use of this content. If you believe any information is incorrect or misleading, please contact us.